First Published: 2011-12-06
It is impossible to discuss transitional justice in a country like Libya without reference to certain key concepts, which are all interrelated, two of which are reconciliation and sustainable peace, notes Mohamed Eljarh.
The issue of transitional justice in
post-conflict Libya is increasingly important in the last few weeks with
the capture of Saif Al-Islam, and the reports of 7000 foreign prisoners
held in Libya with no proper legal processes taking place yet. In many
cases where there has been an armed conflict between two parties in one
country, there has also been some effort towards establishing different
forms of transitional justice to re-establish law and order post the
conflict period. The international community will need to assist Libya
in its efforts to establish transitional justice, bearing in mind that
some forms of justice mechanisms already exist in Libya, but also there
is a void of such mechanisms. These transitional justice mechanisms are
essential to stability and sustainable peace, and Libya should seek such
help and advice from the international community sooner than later.
Transitional
justice should be created to deal with crimes that were committed
during the conflict period, at a stage where the Libyan people were at
the prominence of transition from a society of conflict to one of
democracy and peace, post February 17 revolution. There are wide-ranging
options available to the transitional government in Libya, and the
international community has offered to assist them, to tackle these
crimes, this assistance ranges from applying amnesty to local ownership
of these processes.
Transitional justice mechanisms
may take a number of forms. Most prominently these include the
international criminal court, special courts, truth commissions, local
courts and traditional methods of justice that already exist in Libya.
However, in the case of Libya only the latter three are applicable;
truth commissions, local courts and traditional methods of justice (with
limited help from the International Criminal Court).
The
forms of transitional justice, where local ownership can be more easily
established need to be examined and discussed thoroughly in the case of
Libya, as the new Libyan government opted for taking the matter of
transitional justice into their own hands. It is crucial to analyse
different methods of transitional justice in the country , drawing on a
number of cases, building on the assumption that some form of
transitional justice is essential for reconciliation, future stability
and peace, and moreover that it can serve to increase the sense of local
ownership of the whole process of post-conflict reconstruction.
It
is impossible to discuss transitional justice in a country like Libya
without reference to certain key concepts, which are all interrelated,
two of which are reconciliation and sustainable peace. Reconciliation is
the ultimate objective in Libya for the post-conflict reconstruction
processes to take place; however, it can be very vaguely defined, if at
all, due to the complexity of the situation post any armed revolution.
In its easiest form, reconciliation is referred to as acknowledgement
and repentance from the perpetrators and forgiveness from the victims,
as non-lethal co-existence, as democratic decision-making and
reintegration, and as encompassing four concepts namely truth, mercy,
peace and justice, concepts which in themselves are difficult to define.
The new Libyan government is tasked with defining those concepts
correctly to suit the reality in Libya, as well as, finding practical
approaches to achieving the ultimate reconciliation required for the
country to move forward.
In the case of Libya it is
essential to have distinction between national reconciliation and
individual reconciliation, as we have witnessed individual
reconciliation processes taking place in various Libyan towns, while
national reconciliation is achieved when societal and political
processes function and develop without reverting to previous patterns or
the framework of the conflict. This distinction is crucial because it
is possible to achieve national reconciliation without achieving
individual reconciliation. National reconciliation may come at the
expense of reconciliation at the individual level, although political
processes may proceed and progress individuals may find greater
difficulties in dealing with their experienced traumas, developed during
the conflict. However, reconciliation at the individual level is also
independent of reconciliation at the collective level. Moreover, some
transitional justice mechanisms can promote one type of reconciliation
more than others. Although there is currently a growing consensus
between peace and justice, for example the emphasis on the importance of
integrating justice into the peace process is clearly evident; however,
reconciliation is still frequently described as incompatible with
justice (therefor, reconciliation needs to be promoted to the people by
designing comprehensive national campaigns for that purpose).
Finally,
debates such as, justice vs. reconciliation, justice vs. peace, justice
vs. truth, all emphasise that justice is retributive and reconciliation
is restorative and that there is a trade-off involved. Hence,
suggesting that justice in criminal proceedings context is to attain
group/individual guilt followed by punishment, and this concept will not
lead to reconciliation, stability or peace in Libya as required.
However, there are certain mechanisms of retributive justice, as well as
restorative justice, and these have proven to support reconciliation in
particular contexts in post conflict environments.
Mohamed Eljarh is a UK based Libyan academic researcher and political, social development activist. He is also co-founder and Public Affairs Director of the Libyan Academy for Creativity and Innovation. He is from the city of Tobruk in Eastern Libya. Email: m.eljarh@yahoo.co.uk
Source: Middle East Online - http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=49383
There are wide-ranging alternatives available to the transitional administration in Libya, and the worldwide regional community has provided to support them, to deal with these offences, this support varies from implementing amnesty to regional possession of these methods.
ReplyDeleteExpense forms